Hungrygowhere.sg Home page How informative is the home page? It is the least informative compare to the rest of the website. For now there includes a survey and just an update and a short summary about goodfood.sg. Does it set the proper context for visitors? Not really. Navigation Is the global navigation consistent from page to page? Yes. It is. Do major sections have local navigation? Is it consistent? Yes. It is consistent too. Site organization Yes it is easy to understand as the navigation/headings is stated clearly for you to see. Links and labels** Are labels on section headers and content groupings easy to understand? Yes they are. Yes. Or are they ambiguous and uninformative ("click here" or "white paper")? No they are not. re links spread out in documents, or gathered conveniently in sidebars or other groupings? Yes the search engine is easy to use. Are there basic and advanced search functions? Nope there isn't any advanced search functions What about search results? The search results are the same as the rest. Are they organized and easy to understand? Yes they are as they come with a heading too. Do they give relevance weightings or provide context? Yes they do. Do the search results remind you what you searched for? Yes as it is based on what you search about. Readability Is the font easy to read? Yes they are. Default San-serif fonts are used. Are line lengths acceptable? Yes. Its short and sweet. Is the site easy to scan, with chunked information, or is it just solid blocks of text? Yes it is easy to scan. Performance Overall, do pages load slowly or quickly? Fast. Are graphics and applications like search and multimedia presentations optimized for easy Web viewing? Yes. Content Is their sufficient depth and breadth of content offerings? Yes there is. But there maybe a lack of pictures. Does the content seem to match the mission of the organization and the needs of the audience? Yes it meet the needs of the audience by providing reviews and locations of good foods. Is the site developing its own content or syndicating other sources? The site is developing its own content from different users. Is there a good mix of in-depth material (detailed case studies, articles, and white papers) versus superficial content (press releases, marketing copy)? There is detailed case studies of reviews from users. Consistency Does the site have a consistent, clearly recognizable "look-&-feel"? Yes it does have a look-&-feel. Does it make effective use of repeating visual themes to unify the site? Yes.. Is it visually consistent even without graphics? Yes. Visual Presentation Is the site moderate in its use of color? Yes Does it avoid juxtaposing text and animations? Yes. Does it provide feedback whenever possible? Yes they do. What are the strengths of the site? The amount of food that you ate able to search about. And the provided navigations at the left. What are the areas for improvements? Add more pictures.
Is the site organization intuitive and easy to understand?
Are links easy to distinguish from each other?
Search and search results
Is the search engine easy to use?
Hungrygowhere.sg
Home page
How informative is the home page?
It is very imformative however i feel that too much information have been juggled up.
Does it set the proper context for visitors?
Yes.
Navigation
Is the global navigation consistent from page to page?
Yes. It is.
Do major sections have local navigation? Is it consistent?
Yes. It is consistent too.
Site organization
Is the site organization intuitive and easy to understand?
No it doesn't really.
Links and labels**
Are labels on section headers and content groupings easy to understand?
No they are not easy to understand. Instead some of them needs registered users to be able to enter.
Are links easy to distinguish from each other?
Yes.
Or are they ambiguous and uninformative ("click here" or "white paper")?
No they are not.
re links spread out in documents, or gathered conveniently in sidebars or other groupings?
Search and search results
Is the search engine easy to use?
Yes the search engine is also quite special.
Are there basic and advanced search functions?
Yes there is.
What about search results?
(Currently unable to search).
Are they organized and easy to understand?
Nil
Do they give relevance weightings or provide context?
Nil
Do the search results remind you what you searched for?
Nil
Readability
Is the font easy to read?
Yes they are. Default San-serif fonts are used.
Are line lengths acceptable?
Yes. Its short and sweet.
Is the site easy to scan, with chunked information, or is it just solid blocks of text?
Not easy to scan. Their informations are chunked.
Performance
Overall, do pages load slowly or quickly?
Fast.
Are graphics and applications like search and multimedia presentations optimized for easy Web viewing?
Yes it is.
Content
Is their sufficient depth and breadth of content offerings?
Yes there is.
Does the content seem to match the mission of the organization and the needs of the audience?
Yes it meet the needs of the audience.
Is the site developing its own content or syndicating other sources?
The site is developing its own content from different users.
Is there a good mix of in-depth material (detailed case studies, articles, and white papers) versus superficial content (press releases, marketing copy)?
There is detailed case studies of reviews from users.
Consistency
Does the site have a consistent, clearly recognizable "look-&-feel"?
No its does. Informations are juggled up and its not very userfriendly to me.
Does it make effective use of repeating visual themes to unify the site?
Yes..
Is it visually consistent even without graphics?
No.
Visual Presentation
Is the site moderate in its use of color?
Yes
Does it avoid juxtaposing text and animations?
Yes.
Does it provide feedback whenever possible?
Yes they do.
hat are the strengths of the site?
The honest reviews about restaurants in singapore and the very clear search engine.
What are the areas for improvements?
Enable everyone to view the headings.
Yum.sg
Home page
How informative is the home page?
The homepage is very well balanced with images and informations provided. Different informations are grouped in different rectangles to make the page more organised to prevent alot of informations to juggle up and causes people lost interest by seeing informations been juggled up and they have to search the information themselves.
Does it set the proper context for visitors?
Yes. Different informations are grouped in different rectangles.
Navigation
Is the global navigation consistent from page to page?
Yes. It is.
Do major sections have local navigation? Is it consistent?
Yes. It is consistent too.
Site organization
Is the site organization intuitive and easy to understand?
Yes. Of course.
Links and labels**
Are labels on section headers and content groupings easy to understand?
Yes. They used very generalize titles. Eg Home, About Us ,FAQ etc etc.
Are links easy to distinguish from each other?
Not really. In the homepage, some headings of the rectangle has links but some doesn't.
Or are they ambiguous and uninformative ("click here" or "white paper")?
No they are not
re links spread out in documents, or gathered conveniently in sidebars or other groupings?
Search and search results
Is the search engine easy to use?
Yes, the search engine is very special.
Are there basic and advanced search functions?
Yes there is.
What about search results?
They came out with results that are includes the word you searched.
Are they organized and easy to understand?
Yes they are.
Do they give relevance weightings or provide context?
Yes they do.
Do the search results remind you what you searched for?
Yes because the word you searched for, will always be included
Readability
Is the font easy to read?
Yes they are. Default San-serif fonts are used.
Are line lengths acceptable?
Yes. Its short and sweet.
Is the site easy to scan, with chunked information, or is it just solid blocks of text?
Yes. The informations are categorize in different rectangles therefore its easy to scan.
Performance
Overall, do pages load slowly or quickly?
Fast.
Are graphics and applications like search and multimedia presentations optimized for easy Web viewing?
Yes it is.
Content
Is their sufficient depth and breadth of content offerings?
Yes there is.
Does the content seem to match the mission of the organization and the needs of the audience?
Yes it matches the aspect of its policy.
Is the site developing its own content or syndicating other sources?
The site is developing its own content.
Is there a good mix of in-depth material (detailed case studies, articles, and white papers) versus superficial content (press releases, marketing copy)?
There is detailed case studies of reviews
Consistency
Does the site have a consistent, clearly recognizable "look-&-feel"?
Yes it does.
Does it make effective use of repeating visual themes to unify the site?
Yes.
Is it visually consistent even without graphics?
No
Visual Presentation
Is the site moderate in its use of color?
Yes
Does it avoid juxtaposing text and animations?
Yes.
Does it provide feedback whenever possible?
Yes they do. For different restaurants, registered users are able to review/comment about the restaurant.
What are the strengths of the site?
The honest reviews about restaurants in singapore.
What are the areas for improvements?
They should include more food in one restaurant.
Global.RalphLauren.com
Home page
How informative is the home page?
The homepage is very visual-based then with very minimum number of words. The largest image of the homepage is about the latest design and trend for the season of the year. The whole layout is very summarised with the news of Ralph Lauren at the bottom while its global navigation is at the top therefore its not very informative.
Does it set the proper context for visitors?
Yes.
Navigation
Is the global navigation consistent from page to page?
Yes.
Do major sections have local navigation? Is it consistent?
Yes. It is consistent too.
Site organization
Is the site organization intuitive and easy to understand?
Yes.
Links and labels**
Are labels on section headers and content groupings easy to understand?
Yes. They used very generalise titles. Eg men, women.
Are links easy to distinguish from each other?
Yes
Or are they ambiguous and uninformative ("click here" or "white paper")?
No they are not
re links spread out in documents, or gathered conveniently in sidebars or other groupings?
Search and search results
Is the search engine easy to use?
No there is no search engine.
Are there basic and advanced search functions?
No
What about search results?
Nil.
Are they organized and easy to understand?
Nil.
Do they give relevance weightings or provide context?
Nil.
Do the search results remind you what you searched for?
Nil.
Readability
Is the font easy to read?
Yes. But when clicked on ABOUT RALPH LAUREN, the bottom links colour are not really about to standout.
Are line lengths acceptable?
Yes. Its short and sweet.
Is the site easy to scan, with chunked information, or is it just solid blocks of text?
Yes. Mainly the collection part consist of only pictures.
Performance
Overall, do pages load slowly or quickly?
Slow.
Are graphics and applications like search and multimedia presentations optimized for easy Web viewing?
Yes it is.
Content
Is their sufficient depth and breadth of content offerings?
No
Does the content seem to match the mission of the organization and the needs of the audience?
Yes it matches the mission and needs of audience very well.
Is the site developing its own content or syndicating other sources?
The site is developing its own content.
Is there a good mix of in-depth material (detailed case studies, articles, and white papers) versus superficial content (press releases, marketing copy)?
No but there is enough press release.
Consistency
Does the site have a consistent, clearly recognizable "look-&-feel"?
Yes it does.
Does it make effective use of repeating visual themes to unify the site?
Yes.
Is it visually consistent even without graphics?
No
Visual Presentation
Is the site moderate in its use of color?
Yes
Does it avoid juxtaposing text and animations?
Yes.
Does it provide feedback whenever possible?
(for example, through the use of an easily recognizable ALINK color, or a "reply" screen for forms-based pages)
Nope they don't.
What are the strengths of the site?
It is very visual-base and with very little words.
What are the areas for improvements?
There should be a Search button. More information regarding the clothes should be added. Eg: sizing.
Nudie Jeans.com
Home page
How informative is the home page?
The homepage is seperate into 4 part with a simple layout. Firstly is the top part which is the toolbar and its company name. Secondly is the middle left part which consist of the general headings and a brief description of what the is section about. Thirdly the middle right part. This part contains the ever-changing images of products and comsumer wearing the products. Last but not least , the bottom part. It contains the all right reserved and the very right hand side of it contains heading of Contact and Press.
Does it set the proper context for visitors?
Yes. It does set proper context for visitors. For the homepage of a fashion site I think the important thing is to show what kind of products or garments they are selling and this is which Nudie Jeans did it . Firstly there is the clear and big tool bar which has collection as one of their main heading. Secondly the homepage actually shown picture of the products been worn by comsumers. Then lastly there is the left hand side section which shows heading that links that to information about the products. This three points is proper context for visitors wanting information about the products.
Navigation
Is the global navigation consistent from page to page?
Yes.
Do major sections have local navigation? Is it consistent?
Yes. It is consistent too.
Site organization
Is the site organization intuitive and easy to understand?
Yes.
Links and labels**
Are labels on section headers and content groupings easy to understand?
Yes. On homepage section headers comes with a brief description on that is it about.
Are links easy to distinguish from each other?
Yes they are easily abt to distinguish from each other
Or are they ambiguous and uninformative ("click here" or "white paper")?
No they are not
re links spread out in documents, or gathered conveniently in sidebars or other groupings?
Search and search results
Is the search engine easy to use?
Yes.
Are there basic and advanced search functions?
There are basic search functions because they only search for answers that people asked the Q&A.
What about search results?
The search results are answers provided for people who post a question regarding the jeans.
Are they organized and easy to understand?
Yes.
Do they give relevance weightings or provide context?
They provide relevance weighting.
Do the search results remind you what you searched for?
Not really.
Readability
Yes. It is.
Are line lengths acceptable?
Yes. They are all kept within a limited space therefore the lengths are acceptable.
Is the site easy to scan, with chunked information, or is it just solid blocks of text?
Yes. With the global navigation, it already generalise on the stuff that you wanna find. And the website provides actually pictures of jeans using Javascript instead of just words and pictures. Its is very interactive.
Performance
Slow
Are graphics and applications like search and multimedia presentations optimized for easy Web viewing?
Yes it is.
Content
Yes there is very sufficient content offerings. It not only offer information about the jeans price and style but it also offers information on how to achieve the kind of jeans quality you wants. It even provides extra information.
Does the content seem to match the mission of the organization and the needs of the audience?
Yes it matches the mission and needs of audience very well.
Is the site developing its own content or syndicating other sources?
The site is definately developing its own content. It even provides videos on how its' jeans is been made.
Is there a good mix of in-depth material (detailed case studies, articles, and white papers) versus superficial content (press releases, marketing copy)?
Yes there is a good mix of material. During the collection viewing, they even provided case studies of how the jeans will look like after the wash or so.
Consistency
Yes it does.
Does it make effective use of repeating visual themes to unify the site?
Yes.
Is it visually consistent even without graphics?
No
Visual Presentation
Yes
Does it avoid juxtaposing text and animations?
It definately avoid.
Does it provide feedback whenever possible?
(for example, through the use of an easily recognizable ALINK color, or a "reply" screen for forms-based pages)
They provide a Q&A with quick replies.
What are the strengths of the site?
It is very interactive. It makes buyer more interested in their jeans.
What are the areas for improvements?
There should be a Search button to search for products instead of Answers replying to questions.
Generally I like to have a simple index page with less information so you can see that I only have 7 main heads and everything except Links and Search are put inside the groups. Links and search belongs to no group and will be put on the main page .
My own way of sorting:
Home
- Exhibitions & Events - Exhibitions Calendar, ArtBank, Collections, SAM permanent collection, Events
- About us - Overview, Information, Corporate Partnership, Join Us
- Visitor Information - SAM Architecture, Facilites on SAM, Store Publications, Newsroom, Image Request Form,
- Donations - Other ways of contributing
- SiteMap
- Links
First User - Teacher
Home
Artbank
Collections - SAM permanent collection
Overview - About us , Join Us , Information , Corporate Partnership
Newsroom
Exhibitions & Events - Exhibitions Calender , Events , Event2
Donations - Other way of contributing
Facilities of SAM - SAM Architecture
Visitor Information - Store publication
Image Request Form
Second User - Animation Student
Home
About us - Overview
NewsRoom
Exhibitions Calendar - Exhibitions & Events, Event1 , Event2
ArtBank - Collections , SAM permanent collection , SAM architecture , Image request form , Store publication
Information - Visitor Information, Corporate partnership , Facilities of SAM, Join Us
Donations - Other ways of Contributing
Third User - Games Student
Home
About us - overview , information, SAM architecture, Facilities of SAM
Exhibitions & Events - Event1 , Event2 , Exhibition Calendar
Art Bank - Collection , SAM permanent collection
Visitor information - News room, Store publication
Join Us - Corporate Partnership
Other ways of Contribution - Donation , Image request form
My own way of sorting:
Home
- Exhibitions & Events - Exhibitions Calendar, ArtBank, Collections, SAM permanent collection, Events
- About us - Overview, Information, Corporate Partnership, Join Us
- Visitor Information - SAM Architecture, Facilites on SAM, Store Publications, Newsroom, Image Request Form
- Donations - Other ways of contributing
First User - Teacher
Home
Artbank
Collections - SAM permanent collection
Overview - About us , Join Us , Information , Corporate Partnership
Newsroom
Exhibitions & Events - Exhibitions Calender , Events , Event2
Donations - Other way of contributing
Facilities of SAM - SAM Architecture
Visitor Information - Store publication
Image Request Form
Second User - Animation Student
Home
About us - Overview
NewsRoom
Exhibitions Calendar - Exhibitions & Events, Event1 , Event2
ArtBank - Collections , SAM permanent collection , SAM architecture , Image request form , Store publication
Information - Visitor Information, Corporate partnership , Facilities of SAM, Join Us
Donations - Other ways of Contributing
Third User - Games Student
Home
About us - overview , information, SAM architecture, Facilities of SAM
Exhibitions & Events - Event1 , Event2 , Exhibition Calendar
Art Bank - Collection , SAM permanent collection
Visitor information - News room, Store publication
Join Us - Corporate Partnership
Other ways of Contribution - Donation , Image request form
Tate Online: British and international modern and contemporary art
1.What are you trying to show off? / Purpose of the website
-Trying to show off works of both Modern and Contemporary Art and current exhibitions.
2.Who is their target audience?
-Tourist/Artist.
3.What is the corporate color/s?
-Purple, Orange, Red and Blue.
4.What you like/dislike about the site. Why?
-I dislike how they organise the information with just alot words without much pictures.
-However I like how they group up the different caterogies each with a different colour layout and the colour layout is actually the corporate colours.
MoMa The Museum of Modern Art
1.What are you trying to show off? / Purpose of the website
-Trying to show off the works,current exhibitions and its store.
2.Who is their target audience?
-Tourist/Artist. Interested buyers.
3.What is the corporate color/s?
-White.
4.What you like/dislike about the site. Why?
-I dislike colours used for the website. Because it looks too much like those corporates website instead of a museum website.
-I like that MoMa is clear and easy to navigate with the help of its side bar.
-No identity
Tate Online: British and international modern and contemporary art
1.What are you trying to show off? / Purpose of the website
-Trying to show off works of both Modern and Contemporary Art and current exhibitions.
2.Who is their target audience?
-Tourist/Artist.
3.What is the corporate color/s?
-Purple, Orange, Red and Blue.
4.What you like/dislike about the site. Why?
-I dislike how they organise the information with just alot words without much pictures.
-However I like how they group up the different caterogies each with a different colour layout and the colour layout is actually the corporate colours.
MoMa The Museum of Modern Art
1.What are you trying to show off? / Purpose of the website
-Trying to show off the works,current exhibitions and its store.
2.Who is their target audience?
-Tourist/Artist. Interested buyers.
3.What is the corporate color/s?
-White.
4.What you like/dislike about the site. Why?
-I dislike colours used for the website. Because it looks too much like those corporates website instead of a museum website.
-I like that MoMa is clear and easy to navigate with the help of its side bar.
-No identity
My Groups
-
Grey's Anatomy Lovers Updated: 4 days ago
Neighborhood
Explore friends, family, friends & family, or entire neighborhood.
